Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of articles included in the sedentary factor meta-analysis in alphabetical order

From: Impact of physical activity and sedentary behaviour on fall risks in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

First author–country

Year

Sample size (men/women)

Fallers, n (%)

Mean age ± SD (min–max)

Judgement criteria (the fall)

Study quality (ANAES [30])

Definition of sedentary factor

Number

Length

Collection

Brassington–USA [58]

2000

1,526 (555/971)

284 (18.6)

u.k. ± u.k. (65–99)

1 fall and +

1 year

Patient interrogation

4

Underactive

Isberner–USA [49]

1998

90 (33/57)

45 (50.0)

78.2 ± u.k. (63–99)

1 fall and +

7 months

Patient interrogation

3

Physically inactive

Ishizuka–Brazil [64]

2005

49 (8/41)

32 (65.3)

71.2 ± 5 (60–u.k.)

1 fall and +

u.k.

Patient interrogation

4

Sedentary

Koepsell–USA [50]

2004

654 (212/442)

327 (50.0)

u.k. ± u.k. (65–u.k.)

1 fall and +

2 years

Notebook patient

3

Physically active: not at all

Lord–Australia [62]

1993

704 (0/704)

239 (33.9)

74.6 ± u.k. (65–99)

1 fall and +

1 year

Patient interrogation

4

Any activity

Luukinen–Finland [40]

1996

788 (276/512)

88 (11.2)

76.1 ± 5 (70–92)

2 falls and +

2 years

Patient interrogation

2

Essential daily activity only

Murray–Australia [65]

2005

40 (10/30)

20 (50.0)

78.2 ± u.k. (64–90)

1 fall and +

1 year

Patient interrogation

4

Not very physically active

Pajala–Finland [66]

2006

428 (0/428)

198 (46.3)

68.6 ± 3 (63–76)

1 fall and +

1 year

Notebook patient

2

Sedentary

  1. SD standard deviation, u.k. unknown