From: Training effects on motor–cognitive dual-task performance in older adults
Study | Quality criteria | Quality score | General remarks | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | |||
RCTs | ||||||||||||||
Hall b [23] | x | – | – | – | u | u | u | u | – | x | x | (x) | 1 + 2 | k: statistical information missing, e.g., ES |
Hiyamazu [29] | x | x | x | x | u | u | x | u | – | x | x | x | 5 + 3 | |
Silsudapol [66] | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | (x) | 9 + 2 | Small SS |
Silsudapol [67] | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | (x) | 9 + 2 | Small SS |
Trombetti [80] | (x) | u | x | x | u | u | x | x | x | x | x | x | 5 + 3 | Randomization process unclear |
Westlake [93] | x | x | – | u | x | x | x | x | – | x | x | (x) | 6 + 2 | |
Age comparison designs | ||||||||||||||
Dault [16] | x | x | x | x | – | x | x | (x) | 4 + 2 | 6 trails only – f+g implicit | ||||
Doumas [18] | x | u | x | x | – | x | x | x | 4 + 2 | g suggested out of d and f | ||||
Bisson [9] | – | u | x | u | x | u | x | x | – | x | x | (x) | 4 + 2 | g suggested out of d and f |
Heiden and Lajoie [28] | x | – | – | x | u | u | u | x | – | x | x | (x) | 3 + 2 | Randomization process was weak |
Lajoie [79] | – | – | x | u | u | u | u | x | – | x | x | x | 2 + 3 | |
Toulotte [79] | x | u | u | u | x | – | (x) | x | (x) | 2 + 1 | a: classification in faller/non-faller; k: statistical information missing, e.g., ES | |||
You [104] | x | u | x | u | x | x | x | x | – | x | x | (x) | 6 + 2 |