Skip to main content

Table 2 Group comparison of physical and cognitive outcomes at baseline (mean and standard deviation, SD)

From: The effect of sensor-based exercise at home on functional performance associated with fall risk in older people – a comparison of two exergame interventions

 

KIN

SMT

Control

 
    

p-value

PPA score

1.1 (0.8)

2.0 (0.9)

1.8 (1.1)

0.001 *,**

Contrast sensitivity scoreb

21.6 (1.9)

20.8 (2.2)

21.0 (2.6)

0.412

Proprioception (degree)a

1.8 (1.1)

2.9 (1.7)

2.6 (1.6)

0.007 *,**

Knee extension strength (kg)b

20.8 (9.4)

24.2 (10.3)

21.9 (8.6)

0.318

Standing balance (mm)a

261 (124)

377 (152)

379 (188)

0.003 *,**

Finger-press reaction time (ms)

240 (45)

259 (45)

247 (45)

0.225

Timed up & go (s)a

11.5 (3.5)

11.5 (3.1)

12.4 (3.7)

0.317

Sit-to-stand transfer (s)a

13.6 (4.8)

13.1 (3.8)

14.4 (4.9)

0.340

ANT alert (ms)b

34 (32)

34 (35)

39 (33)

0.789

ANT orient (ms)b

40 (43)

60 (43)

44 (45)

0.128

ANT conflict (ms)a

118 (67)

154 (120)

137 (74)

0.533

Stroop CW_incongruency - time (s)

68.3 (32.3)

65.0 (28.4)

75.5 (38.0)

0.314

Stroop CW_incongruency - errorsa

4.5 (3.4)

6.1 (4.0)

6.2 (5.4)

0.270

Stroop efficiency (CW_incongruent/C)

2.0 (0.5)

2.2 (0.8)

2.4 (1.0)

0.147

Digit span backwards (length of sequence)ab

6.8 (2.6)

5.1 (1.0)

5.3 (1.4)

0.001 *,**

  1. aLog transformed
  2. bHigher values indicate better performance KIN Microsoft-Kinect®, SMT step-mat-training, PPA Physiological Profile Assessment, ANT Attentional Network Test, CW colour-word, C colour
  3. *Post-hoc tests (Tukey) results indicate difference between KIN and Control
  4. **Post-hoc tests (Tukey) results indicate difference between KIN and SMT