Study | Participants Exposed to Perturbations | Perturbation Paradigm | Reactive Response Assessment and/or Falls Monitoring | Main Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perturbation Type/Magnitude | Protocol | ||||
Bhatt et al. [55] | Single session: n = 25, 13♀, 73.42 ± 5.42y. Dual session: n = 13, 7♀, 70.13 ± 4.75y. All community dwelling, healthy older adults | Slip (low friction moveable platform; slid up to 90 cm forward at foot contact). | Single session: 24 slips in 37 gait trials. Dual session: as above, plus 1 slip trial 3mo later. | Stability, loss of balance & hip height during slip 1 & 24, & the single slip at +6mo. % of falls following the lab perturbations. | Improvement in the observed parameters from slip 1 to 24. Retention in all parameters at +6mo, greater for the dual group. |
Bierbaum et al. [64] | 13♂, 67.4 ± 3.4y. Community dwelling, healthy. | Surface change perturbation (17 cm thick foam with an average of 10 cm deformation). | 19 trials with the 2nd, 8th & 19th as a hard surface, & the rest soft surface. | MoS, BoS & XCoM at touchdown of perturbed & recovery steps. | Improvement across trials in the outcome parameters. |
Bierbaum et al. [65] | 14♂, 67.3 ± 4.2y. Community dwelling, healthy. | Surface change perturbation (17 cm thick foam with an average of 10 cm deformation). | 28 trials: 23 with hard surface, 5 with soft surface. | MoS, BoS & XCoM at touchdown of the perturbed & recovery steps. | Improved MoS of the recovery step for the 4th & 5th perturbations compared to the 1st. |
Lurie et al. [56] | n = 26, 13♀, 81 ± 6.53y. Healthy older adults referred for gait and balance training. | Anterior/posterior treadmill accelerations of progressive magnitude (scale of 1–5, exact values not reported). | 5.84 sessions of 44.25mins (means). Therapist determined perturbation type (stance or gait), magnitude & number. | Mean perturbation magnitude successfully negotiated per session. Retrospective falls data 3mo preceding & for 3mo after the intervention. | Improved mean trip magnitude from 2.44 to 3.44. Non-significant difference in subjects experiencing falls (19% vs. 33%) compared to controls. |
Pai et al. [62] | n = 38, 19♀, 71 ± 5y. Community dwelling, healthy. | Slip (low friction moveable platform; slid up to 90 cm forward at foot contact). | 24 slips in 37 gait trials. | Stability, loss of balance & hip height 300 ms after perturbation onset. % of falls following the lab perturbations. | Reduction in falls & backward losses of balance across trials. Improvement in limb support & stability in the first 3 trials with no further improvement. |
Pai et al. [57] | n = 67, 44♀, 72 ± 5.5y. Community dwelling, healthy. | Slip (low friction moveable platform; slid up to 90 cm forward at foot contact). | 24 slips in 37 gait trials. | Retrospective falls data 12mo preceding & 12mo prospective following the session. | Reduction in falls 12mo post-session compared to 12mo pre-session (15% compared to 34% incidence). |
Pai et al. [63] | 3 groups tested +6, +9 & +12mo respectively: +6mo: n = 24, 13♀ 74.6 ± 5.8y; +9mo: n = 23, 15♀ 71.8 ± 5.5y; +12mo: n = 26, 19♀ 72.0 ± 4.7y. All community dwelling, healthy. | Slip (low friction moveable platform; slid up to 90 cm forward at foot contact). | 24 slips in 37 gait trials. | Proactive & reactive stability (measured at touchdown of the to-be-perturbed step & the first recovery step respectively). % of falls following the lab perturbations. | Falls reduction from 42.5% to 0%. 0%, 8.7% & 11.5% of participants at the +6mo, +9mo & +12mo slips respectively fell. Stability improved & was better at all time points than the first slip. |
Parijat and Lockhart [58] | Training: n = 12, 71.24 ± 6.82y. Control: n = 12, 74.18 ± 5.82y 12♂ 12♀. All community dwelling, healthy. | Pre-post: slippery surface. Training: slip (moveable platform; 30 cm at 1.2 m/s forward) with ±20% velocity based on ability. | 12 slips in 24 gait trials. | Slip distance & peak sliding heel velocity pre- & post-training on the slippery surface. % of falls following the lab perturbations. | Falls reduction on slippery surface from 42% (pre) to 0% (post). The reduction in slip distance & peak sliding heel velocity was greater in the training group. |
Sakai et al. [66] | n = 45, 26♀, 71.4 ± 3.6y. Community dwelling, healthy. | Treadmill decelerations at heel strike during walking at 2 km/h. 50% reduction in belt speed lasting 500 ms. | 20 sudden treadmill belt decelerations at heel strike during 5mins of walking. | Peak forward & backward sacrum accelerations (accelerometer) within 1 gait cycle post-perturbation (average of first & last 10 perturbations). | Mean peak sacrum accelerations were lower in the final 10, compared to the first 10 perturbations. |