Skip to main content

Table 1 Study quality of included trials according to a modified PEDro scale

From: Exercise or physical activity and cognitive function in adults with type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance or impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review

Criterion

Watson

et al.

2006 [35]

Colberg

et al.

2008 [36]

Devore

et al.

2009 [37]

Baker

et al.

2010 [38]

Yanagawa

et al.

2011 [39]

Lehtisalo

et al.

2016 [40]

Study Design

RCT

CS

CS

LS

RCT

NRCT

RCT

Eligibility Criteria

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Random allocation

Y

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

N

Y

Concealed allocation

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

Group baseline similarity

Y

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Blinding of subjects

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

Blinding of therapists

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

N

N

Blinding of assessors

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

Measures of one key outcome in at least 85% of participants

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

At least one key outcomes analyzed with ‘intention to treat’

N

N

N

N

Y

N

N

Point measures, and measures of variability for at least one key outcome

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Between group statistical comparisons reported for at least one key outcome

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Full supervision of exercise intervention

Y

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Final score (/ 12)

7

4

4

4

9

6

7

  1. Points are only awarded when a criterion is clearly satisfied within a modified PEDro Scale. PEDro Scale Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale, CS cross-sectional study, PS prospective study, RCT randomized controlled trial, NRCT non-randomized controlled trial, N/A, not applicable, Y = 1 N or N/A = 0