Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality score

From: A taxonomy of cognitive tasks to evaluate cognitive-motor interference on spatiotemoporal gait parameters in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Quality score

Remarks

Asai [87]

2014

(x)

(x)

x

x

(x)

x

x

x

no

x

x

17

design is not clearly identified; differences in subgroups variables sex (f/m), no studies for accuracy of accelerometer, SEM or validity

Auvinet [74]

2017

x

x

x

x

(x)

(x)

(x)

x

(x)

x

(x)

17

no studies for accuracy of equipment, SEM or validity; study is mainly descriptive: no control for baseline characteristics; sample size for subgroup “cautious gait” (< 10) low

Bauer [75]

2010

(x)

(x)

x

(x)

x

x

x

(x)

no

x

x

16

design is not clearly identified

Beauchet [19]

2008

x

(x)

x

x

no

x

x

x

no

x

x

17

design is not clearly identified; stopwatch as measurement

Bootsma-van der Wiel [76]

2003

x

x

x

(x)

no

x

x

(x)

x

(x)

x

17

no description of BMI or weight; no report of variance; stopwatch as primary measurement tool

Donoghue [88]

2013

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

no

no

x

x

18

no reporting of estimate variance in results and confounding

Freire Junior [21]

2017

x

(x)

(x)

(x)

x

x

x

no

x

x

x

17

design is not clearly identified; no sufficient description of the population group; no medications or comorbidities reported

Howcroft [77]

2016

x

(x)

x

no

x

(x)

x

no

no

x

x

14

no gait specifications: design is not clearly identified; no description of BMI, cognition or number of medications, no baseline comparison reported

Johannsson [78]

2016

(x)

x

(x)

x

x

x

(x)

x

x

x

x

19

no mention of clear gait parameters (“challenging gait conditions”); research question and hypothesis missing; no sufficient information; in the method section

Mirelman [79]

2012

x

(x)

x

x

x

x

x

x

no

x

x

19

design is not clearly identified

Muhaidat [20]

2013

x

(x)

x

(x)

no

(x)

x

no

(x)

x

x

14

design is not clearly identified; no description number of medications/drugs or disease; stopwatch used as primary measurement tool; pilot study with small sample size (no sample size calculation); differences of baseline characteristics reported but no statistical analysis done

Nordin [80]

2010

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

no

no

(x)

x

17

only medians reported

Reelick [81]

2011

(x)

(x)

(x)

x

x

(x)

(x)

x

no

x

x

15

no gait specifications; design is not clearly identified, no description of BMI or height; small sample size

Reelick [89]

2009

x

(x)

(x)

x

x

(x)

(x)

x

no

x

x

16

design is not clearly identified, small sample size

Springer [82]

2006

x

(x)

(x)

(x)

(x)

(x)

x

(x)

x

(x)

x

15

no sufficient information about study design; no description number of medications/drugs or disease

Toulotte [83]

2006

(x)

x

x

(x)

x

(x)

x

x

x

x

x

19

research question is not precise; no description number of global cognition and medication use or diseases

Toulotte [84]

2006

x

(x)

x

(x)

x

(x)

(x)

x

x

x

x

18

No description of global cognition; report of means and estimate of variance in main results are missing

Verghese [85]

2017

(x)

(x)

x

(x)

x

x

x

(x)

no

(x)

x

15

research question is unclear; study design unclear; no report of variance

Wollesen [90]

2017

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

22

 

Yamada [86]

2011

(x)

(x)

no

(x)

(x)

no

(x)

no

no

no

no

5

research question and hypothesis missing; insufficient information of the other items

  1. Legend: x: yes, (x): partially with general remarks, no: no/unclear. Item 1, sufficient description of question/objective; 2, appropriate study design; 3, appropriate method of participant selection or source of information/input variables; 4, sufficient description of patient characteristics; 5, report of means of assessment with outcome measures well defined and robust to measurement/misclassification bias; 6, appropriate sample size; 7, appropriate analytic methods and method description; 8, report of estimate of variance in main results; 9, control for confounding; 10, sufficiently detailed report of results; 11 conclusions supported by the results. Specifications: 1: clearly description, mention of specific gait parameters (no generalization e.g. gait changes), 2 / 3: precise information of in- and exclusion criteria and recruitment, 4: specific baseline characteristics of population (older people) must include: age, distribution male/female, global cognition, BMI or height/weight, number of medications or chronic disease/comorbidities, and for healthy older people: TuG, SPPB or comparable test of physical abilities, 5: Primary and secondary outcome must be clearly described. Error of measurement must be discussed, 6: sample size calculation should be reported 8: Means and estimate of variance (SD or IQR) must be reported for main outcome