Recommended motor assessments based on psychometric properties in individuals with dementia: a systematic review

Table 7 Summary of outcomes to derive recommendations for motor assessments for individuals with dementia

Motor assessment	Inter-rater reliability		Test-retest reliability		Frequency of use	Time^*group interaction effect size
Motor assessment	relative	absolute	relative	absolute	Frequency of use	Time^*group interaction effect size
Balance
FICSIT-4	?	?	0	–	–	?
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction of Balance	?	?	0	–	–	?
Limits of Stability	?	?	–	–	–	?
Physiomat-Trail-Making Task	?	?	0	?	–	?
Physiomat-Follow-The-Ball Task	?	?	0	?	–	?
FR	0	?	0	0	0	+
Hill Step Test	?	?	0	0	0	?
Step Quick Turn Test	?	?	–	–	–	?
Figure of Eight Test	?	?	0	–	–	?
GMWT	0	0	+	0	–	?
BBS	+	0	+	0	+	+
Modified BBS	?	?	?	?	–	?
POMA	?	?	?	?	+	+
Mobility and gait
TUG	+	+	+	+	+	+
Cognitive TUG	?	?	–	0	0	?
Manual TUG	?	?	+	0	–	?
6 m WT	0	0	0	–	0	?
4 m WT	0	–	0	–	0	0
Instrumented gait analysis	?	?	0	0	+	+
Strength
5x STS	?	?	0	0	+	+
STS on NeuroCom Balance Master	?	?	–	–	–	?
ACSID	+	?	?	?	–	+
30s CST	0	0	0	–	+	+
Handgrip dynamometer	?	?	+	–	0	–
Maximum isometric strength assessed with dynamometers	?	?	0	?	0	?
Endurance
6 min WT	0	?	+	0	0	?
Functional performance
SPPB	?	?	?	?	0	0
E-ADL Test	?	?	0	?	0	?

4 m WT 4-m walk test, 5x STS Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, 6 m WT 6-m walk test, 6 min WT 6-min walk test, 30s CST 30-s chair stand test, ACSID Assessment of Compensatory Sit-to-Stand Maneuvers in People With Dementia, BBS Berg Balance Scale, E-ADL Test Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living, FICSIT-4 Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - subtest 4, FR Functional Reach Test, GMWT Groningen Meander Walking Test, POMA Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, SPPB Short Physical Performance Battery, STS Sit-to-Stand, TUG Timed Up & Go Test.
Relative reliability: - = insufficient, 0 = sufficient, very low/low quality of evidence, + = sufficient, moderate/high quality of evidence,? = not investigated.
Absolute reliability: - = insufficient/unacceptable, 0 = indeterminate/inconsistent/sufficient, very low/low quality of evidence, + = sufficient, moderate/high quality of evidence,? = not investigated.
Frequency of use: - = 1 randomised controlled trial, 0 = 2–5 randomised controlled trials, += > 5 randomised controlled trials.
Time^*group interaction effect size: - = no effect, 0 = at least one trial with small or medium effect, + = at least one trial with large effect,? = could not be calculated/not reported.

ISSN: 1861-6909