Skip to main content

Table 2 Sit-to-Stand tests performance across gender and age

From: Performance on sit-to-stand tests in relation to measures of functional fitness and sarcopenia diagnosis in community-dwelling older adults

 

All (N = 856)

Males (N = 225)

Females (N = 631)

Age

N

30CST (reps)

5TSTS (secs)

N

30CST (reps)

5TSTS (secs)

N

30CST (reps)

5TSTS (secs)

51–60

145

18.5a ± 0.4

8.2a ± 0.2

26

19.0 ± 5.4

8.1± 3.6

119

18.4 ± 4.7

8.2 ± 0.2

61–70

455

16.6b ± 0.2

9.8b ± 0.2

116

17.4 ± 6.1

9.7 ± 4.3

339

16.3 ± 5.0

9.7 ± 0.2

71+

256

13.7c ± 0.3

11.9c ± 0.3

83

13.8 ± 5.1

11.2 ± 4.3

173

13.7 ± 4.3

12.2 ± 0.4

Means

   

240

16.2 ± 6.0

10.1 ± 4.3

647

16.0 ± 5.0

10.2 ± 4.3

  1. 30CST 30 s chair stands; 5TSTS five times sit to stand
  2. Note: Two-way ANOVA showed no significant interaction between age groups and gender for 30CST (F (2,846) =0.61, P=0.543) and 5TSTS (F (2,846) =1.07, P = 0.345). The gender main effect was non-significant for 30CST (F (1,846) =1.92, P =0.166) and 5TSTS (F (1,846) = 1.16, P = 0.282). The age group main effect was significant for 30CST (F (2,846) = 41.16, P< 0.01) and 5TSTS (F (1,846) = 27.33, P < 0.01). Results of post hoc pairwise comparisons on age group means using Tukey HSD P< 0.05 are indicated by superscripted means in the respective columns corresponding to 30CST and 5TSTS. Means not differing significantly would have the same superscript—hence all age group means were significantly different