European Review of Aging and Physical Activity operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two or more experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.
Benefits of double-blind peer review
Double-blind peer review allows reviewers to judge the manuscript based on content alone, and are not biased by knowledge of who the authors are.
The official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity (EGREPA)
2017 Journal Metrics
87 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
80 days to first decision for all manuscripts
182 days from submission to acceptance
15 days from acceptance to publication
266 Altmetric Mentions