- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction: An interrater reliability study of gait analysis systems with the dual task paradigm in healthy young and older adults
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity volume 19, Article number: 24 (2022)
The Original Article was published on 03 August 2021
Correction: Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 18, 17 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00271-z
In the publication of the original article [1] the authors state that the GaitUp system does not allow access to the raw data: “[…] the algorithms of GaitUp are difficult to comprehend because the raw data cannot be accessed” (page 2) and “[…] GaitUp does not allow access to the raw data, so the data cannot be extracted or analyzed independently (page 9).
Since the Physilog 5 launch in 2017, GaitUp has provided the free “Research Toolkit” to its users. This has always been a free on-demand service for all customers (who are only equipped with Physilog 5 or related products such as the gait analysis system used in our study - which was acquired from the University of Paderborn in 2018). Therefore, our statement that the raw data of the acceleration values cannot be accessed, extracted, or analyzed is not correct.
For this reason, the false statements have been deleted and the original article [1] has been updated.
Reference
Klotzbier TJ, Wollesen B, Vogel O, et al. An interrater reliability study of gait analysis systems with the dual task paradigm in healthy young and older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021;18:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00271-z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Klotzbier, T.J., Wollesen, B., Vogel, O. et al. Correction: An interrater reliability study of gait analysis systems with the dual task paradigm in healthy young and older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 19, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-022-00301-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-022-00301-4